VMS
Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (VMS) deposits are one of the world’s most important sources of copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), and gold (Au). These polymetallic ore bodies form through hydrothermal activity on or near the seafloor, where metal-rich fluids precipitate sulphide minerals. VMS deposits are found in both ancient and modern volcanic belts.
Ancient VMS deposits are most commonly found in greenstone belts and accreted volcanic terranes that date back hundreds of millions, or even billions, of years. These deposits are diverse (there are about 6 major types) in composition and setting, recording the imprint of past tectonic environments such as back-arc basins and volcanic island arcs. They include world-class mining districts like Kidd Creek and Noranda in Canada, or the Iberian Pyrite Belt in Europe. Though often altered by metamorphism and deformation, VMS deposits retain geochemical and mineralogical signatures that link them directly to their modern seafloor counterparts.
Present-day VMS systems, also known as seafloor massive sulphides (SMS), forming at active mid-ocean ridges, back-arc basins and volcanic arc fronts, have revolutionized our understanding of ore genesis. These systems are often marked by black smokers—high-temperature hydrothermal vents that discharge metal-rich fluids, precipitating sulphides like pyrite, chalcopyrite, and sphalerite directly onto the seafloor. Studying these active systems provides critical insight into the formation processes, mineral zoning, and environmental conditions of ancient VMS deposits. Sites like the East Pacific Rise, Lau Basin, Juan de Fuca Ridge, and the Kermadec arc allow scientists to observe the interplay between volcanic heat, fluid chemistry, and mineral precipitation in real time. These “natural laboratories” offer unique opportunities to calibrate and refine exploration models for ancient deposits, providing insight into fluid pathways, temperature gradients, and the complex role of microbial communities in ore formation.
ORE DEPOSITS 101 - Part 7 - VMS and Sedex
ORE DEPOSITS 101 - Part 7 - VMS and Sedex
VMS deposits in New Zealand
Onshore VMS deposits
Lead-zinc mineralisation occurs as small lenses of massive sulphide in quartz-sericite schist at Johnston’s United Mine in the Aorere goldfield. Although originally mined for gold between 1866 and 1897, the style of mineralisation attracted some exploration for VMS deposits (Brathwaite and Pirajno 1993). Minerals present include: pyrite, arsenopyrite, pyrrhotite, galena, sphalerite, chalcopyrite and tetrahedrite (Grindley and Wodzicki 1960).
In the early 1990s, Westland Ilmenite Ltd carried out reconnaissance prospecting for VMS deposits associated with the volcanic rocks of the Haupiri Group in Northwest Nelson. Several anomalies were identified in an airborne electromagnetic and magnetic survey and were followed up by geochemical surveys, mapping and ground electromagnetic surveys. This work outlined a few areas of VMS-style alteration and massive pyrite mineralisation, with low concentrations of copper, lead and/or zinc located in tributaries of the Anatoki and Waingaro rivers.
Offshore VMS Deposits in New Zealand – The Kermadec Arc
The Kermadec Arc, stretching 1,200 km from Monowai volcano to New Zealand’s North Island, forms the southern segment of the 2,500 km-long Kermadec-Tonga Arc, one of the most active volcanic chains in the Pacific. This arc consists of more than 30 major submarine volcanic centres, including calderas and cone volcanoes. Many of these volcanoes are hydrothermally active, with at least four confirmed sites hosting metal-rich hydrothermal systems, making the arc a prime location for volcanogenic VMS mineralisation.
Bruce Gemmell - VHMS Deposits: Geology, Genesis and Exploration Potential
Bruce Gemmell - VHMS Deposits: Geology, Genesis and Exploration Potential
Research expeditions by GNS Science, NIWA, and international partners have revealed that about 80% of the major volcanoes in the Kermadec arc host active hydrothermal vent fields, supporting its status as one of the most hydrothermally active intraoceanic arcs in the world. These findings highlight the arc’s mineral potential, particularly for metals such as copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), and gold (Au)—all critical for modern industries.
The Kermadec arc hydrothermal systems are not only important for mineral exploration but also provide insights into submarine ore-forming processes that may have contributed to similar deposits found in ancient geological settings.
VMS Exploration and Research in the Kermadec Arc
Exploration in the Kermadec arc has been ongoing since the 1996 discovery of massive sulphide samples from Brothers and Rumble II West volcanoes. Since then, research has focused on identifying and characterising these seafloor hydrothermal systems through:
- Hydrothermal Plume Surveys: Water-column mapping has helped locate hydrothermal vent fields by detecting chemical anomalies (e.g., enriched metal concentrations, pH changes, and temperature shifts).
- High-Resolution Seafloor Mapping: The deployment of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) such as ABE and Sentry has enabled precise bathymetric surveys, with resolution down to 2 metres, compared to the 25 m resolution of surface vessel surveys.
- Seafloor Sampling and Drilling: Dredging, ROV sampling, and deep-sea drilling (e.g., International Ocean Discovery Program [IODP] drilling at Brothers Volcano in 2018) have allowed for the recovery of mineralised samples.
- Submersibles such as Shinkai 6500 and Pisces V have enabled detailed geological, geochemical, and fluid sampling, improving understanding of sulphide deposit formation.
- Geophysical Surveys: Regional gravity and magnetic surveys have helped identify buried mineralised systems and provided insights into subsurface structures that control fluid flow and mineral deposition.
- Time-Series Studies: Continued research revisits key hydrothermal fields to monitor changes in vent activity, fluid chemistry, and mineral deposition rates over time.
Key VMS Deposits in the Kermadec Arc
Jun Cowan & Carl Brauhart - VMS Origin Great Debate
Jun Cowan & Carl Brauhart - VMS Origin Great Debate
-
Mineral Exploration and Commercial Interest
The economic potential of offshore VMS deposits in the Kermadec arc has attracted exploration companies, including Neptune Resources and Nautilus Minerals, which have conducted surveys using:
- Multi-beam bathymetric mapping
- Seafloor rock and sediment sampling
- Environmental and geophysical assessments
Neptune Resources held prospecting permits over much of the arc and applied for a mining permit at Brothers Volcano in 2008, although these permits expired in 2010. Future commercial interest will likely depend on advancements in deep-sea mining technology and environmental considerations.
-
Prospectivity of the Kermadec Arc
A prospectivity ranking system categorises the volcanoes of the Kermadec arc based on their mineral potential. This assessment, developed by de Ronde et al. (2010), classifies volcanoes into four categories (A to D) based on:
- Presence of hydrothermal activity
- Metal concentrations in vent fluids and sulphides
- Size and longevity of hydrothermal systems
- Geophysical indicators of buried mineralisation
The highest-ranked sites, such as Brothers and Rumble II West, show the greatest potential for future resource development.
-
Environmental and Scientific Considerations
While offshore VMS deposits hold promise for future resource extraction, their exploration and potential mining must be balanced with environmental concerns. Hydrothermal vents are unique deep-sea ecosystems, hosting specialised biological communities that rely on chemical energy rather than sunlight. Research efforts continue to assess the ecological impact of potential deep-sea mining activities in the region.
Furthermore, the Kermadec arc provides valuable analogues for ancient VMS deposits found in land-based mining districts, enhancing our understanding of ore-forming processes and guiding future mineral exploration worldwide.
The Kermadec arc represents one of the world’s most promising offshore regions for VMS mineralisation, hosting significant deposits of copper, zinc, and gold. Advanced exploration techniques have revealed high-grade sulphide mineralisation, particularly at Brothers, Rumble II West, Clark, and Haungaroa volcanoes. Ongoing research will continue to refine mineral prospectivity models, improve understanding of hydrothermal processes, and evaluate the feasibility of future resource extraction in this dynamic and mineral-rich environment.
Why VMS Deposits are Important
-
Economic Value and Resource Supply
VMS deposits host high concentrations of base and precious metals, often in compact, mineable bodies. They have long supported regional economies – from the ancient mining of copper at Cyprus to major modern operations in Canada, Australia, and Japan. Today, they remain important sources of:
- Copper - essential for electrification, construction, and electronics
- Zinc - used for galvanising steel, batteries, and alloys
- Lead - in batteries and shielding
- Silver and gold - in electronics, jewellery, currency, and investment
In a world transitioning to low-carbon technologies, the metals from VMS deposits are central to solar panels, electric vehicles, wind turbines, and high-capacity batteries.
-
Strategic and Critical Minerals
As countries seek secure and sustainable supplies of critical minerals, VMS deposits are a strong target. Copper, zinc, and cobalt (sometimes found in VMS systems) are classified as critical by many nations due to their role in clean technology, infrastructure, and defence. The geographic distribution of VMS resources offers opportunities to diversify supply chains and reduce dependency on a few dominant producers.
-
Scientific Insights
Modern, actively forming VMS systems on the seafloor-such as those at mid-ocean ridges or in volcanic arcs/back-arcs (e.g. the Brothers volcano, Kermadec arc)-are natural laboratories. Studying them has deepened our understanding of:
- Hydrothermal circulation in the oceanic crust
- The role of magmatic and seawater-derived fluids in ore formation
- Metal transport and precipitation mechanisms
- Submarine volcanism and microbial life in extreme environments
These insights not only help us locate ancient VMS deposits on land, but also reveal key Earth processes linked to crust formation and plate tectonics.
-
Exploration for VMS deposits
Discovering new VMS deposits relies on recognising key mineral systems features.
- Geodynamic setting—typically submarine volcanic arcs or rifted margins—where mafic to felsic volcanic rocks provide heat sources, with metals being leached out of the host rocks and in some cases also contributing metals.
- Hydrothermal fluids, driven by magmatic heat, circulate through permeable pathways such as faults, fractures, and porous volcanic units.
- Zoned alteration halos with chlorite, sericite, and silica near the vent, grading outward to carbonate and albite assemblages.
- Geochemically, explorers target enrichments in copper, zinc, lead, silver, and gold, as well as pathfinder elements like barium, antimony, and arsenic. Geophysical surveys are also crucial: electromagnetic methods can detect the conductive massive sulphide lenses, while gravity and magnetics help delineate dense ore bodies and alteration zones. Stratigraphically, VMS deposits are often found at the interface between volcanic rocks and overlying sediments, sometimes marked by chemical exhalative layers like chert, barite, or iron-rich horizons. Metal zoning—typically with copper-gold at the core and zinc-lead-silver in outer zones—provides vectors to the heart of the system. Successful exploration integrates these geological, geochemical, and geophysical features to build predictive models for discovery.
- VMS deposits, especially ancient ones, are relatively easy to explore due to their distinct geophysical and geochemical footprints. Their formation is tightly tied to volcanic and tectonic settings, allowing predictive models to be developed. Moreover, VMS mines can be compact in size with high-grade ores, leading to smaller environmental footprints per tonne of metal-though legacy environmental issues like acid mine drainage must still be managed.
Geochemically, explorers target enrichments in copper, zinc, lead, silver, and gold, as well as pathfinder elements like barium, antimony, and arsenic. Geophysical surveys are also crucial: electromagnetic methods can detect the conductive massive sulphide lenses, while gravity and magnetics help delineate dense ore bodies and alteration zones. Stratigraphically, VMS deposits are often found at the interface between volcanic rocks and overlying sediments, sometimes marked by chemical exhalative layers like chert, barite, or iron-rich horizons. Metal zoning—typically with copper-gold at the core and zinc-lead-silver in outer zones—provides vectors to the heart of the system. Successful exploration integrates these geological, geochemical, and geophysical features to build predictive models for discovery.
VMS deposits, especially ancient ones, are relatively easy to explore due to their distinct geophysical and geochemical footprints. Their formation is tightly tied to volcanic and tectonic settings, allowing predictive models to be developed. Moreover, VMS mines can be compact in size with high-grade ores, leading to smaller environmental footprints per tonne of metal-though legacy environmental issues like acid mine drainage must still be managed.
Additional reading
Franklin, J. M., Gibson, H. L., Galley, A. G., & Jonasson, I. R. (2005). Volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits. In Hedenquist, J. W., Thompson, J. F. H., Goldfarb, R. J., & Richards, J. P. (Eds.), Economic Geology 100th Anniversary Volume, pp. 523–560.
Galley, A. G., Hannington, M. D., & Jonasson, I. R. (2007). Volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits. In W.D. Goodfellow (Ed.), Mineral Deposits of Canada: A Synthesis of Major Deposit Types, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces, and Exploration Methods. Geological Association of Canada, Mineral Deposits Division, Special Publication No. 5, pp. 141–161.
Ross, P. S., & Mercier-Langevin, P. (2014). Igneous rock associations 14. The volcanic setting of VMS and SMS deposits: A review. Geoscience Canada, 41(3), 361–387. https://doi.org/10.12789/geocanj.2014.41.051(external link)
Brathwaite RL, Pirajno F. 1993. Metallogenic map of New Zealand. Lower Hutt (NZ): Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences. 215 p. (Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences monograph; 3).
de Ronde CEJ, Leybourne MI, Berthelsen TJ. 2010. Prospectivity of Kermadec arc submarine volcanoes for massive sulphide mineralisation. Lower Hutt (NZ): GNS Science. 16 p. Consultancy Report 2010/119. Prepared for Crown Minerals, Ministry of Economic Development.
Grindley GW, Wodzicki A. 1960. Base metal and gold-silver mineralisation on the south-east side of the Aorere valley, north-west Nelson. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics. 3(4):585–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.1960.10420147(external link)
Ross P.-S., Mercier-Langevin P. 2014. Igneous Rock Associations 14. The Volcanic Setting of VMS and SMS Deposits: A Review. Geoscience Canada, 41(3), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.12789/geocanj.2014.41.045(external link)
Timm C, Wysoczanski RJ, de Ronde CEJ. 2016. Potential sources of metals in Kermadec arc lavas. In: Christie AB, editor. Mineral deposits of New Zealand: exploration and research.Carlton (AU): Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. p. 397–402. (Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy monograph series; 31).